HALIDE FILM TEXTURE Worlds most powerful film texturing plugin for Davinci Resolve https://digitalchemistry.xyz/
3rd party sellers will have it... Since it requires a fix, I don't think anybody will be able to share it here. Maybe in the future
The invizigrain that is available on 3rd party store is old version, invizigrain uses real film grain scanned tiff images and it's good. I haven't tried Halilde, it's said that they uses procedural algorithms, dehancer, filmbox, cinedream, mononodes's dctl, colorlab, genesis, resolve's native grain - this plugins uses procedural algorithms. Out of these genesis looks the best in my opinion.
what do you think about diachromie and diaphanie? Have you ever tried that plugin? do you think can i use the plugin on other color management workflow? i use color science davinci yrgb i really confused
These are just options, they are good at some uses but not a magic too like they advertised. Diaphanie - I don't use, don't like to. Diachromie - I use it from time to time to test looks, its interface ain't good. For split toning I use either rapidgrade or PFA plugins, there's also color seperation dctl by Henry Bobeck. Diachromie, like contour has safe gates, so you can't go heavy grade. For split toning there's no single perfect solution. There's also Pixeltools dctls. It's hard man. I stopped looking for new plugin lol. Genesis + diachromie should do for you. And there's opendrt, jp99, resolve cst, filmbox works with jp99, genesis doesn't work with other drt. It's all confusion. Only way to try out test them.
so diachromie it's worth to buy? maybe you have recommend plugin or dctl you always use on your works
They are all pretty good. for grain there are several that are really good as well. The Arri Film Lab is also very good. I agree with m0rpheus that izigrain is kind of old and is a huge package bc it loads its own grain profiles. Also Izigrain cannot be used on vertical formats for some reason. But either way the 3rd party sellers are selling all of these for "pennies on the Dollar". So I have all of them in my arsenal. But for 90% of my quick turn around work I usually just use Filmbox pro to tell you the truth.
i use filmbox too but i wanted to try diachromie maybe just explore Maybe you have an opinion about diachromie, is the plugin good or not?
Filmbox or Filmbox pro? Pro is much "better". I really like diachromie and diaphine personally but I am not a professional colorists by any means. Aletheia is also a new one and is quite good as well.
It depends on the project. Genesis is stable on my node tree, I tried filmbox pro but the skin tones in filmbox looks way to orange-yellow for my taste but filmbox has more color finessing tools, I use genesis for halation. Some good alternatives - gpu accelerated dctls are also available for halation. For grain I use invizigrain or genesis. Split toning - maybe diachromie or PFA or rapidgrade or custom midgray locked curve. If the project ask for non filmic color, I use maybe a mix of cst 709 or open drt or jp99 dctl. Before genesis came out, I used to use filmbox. Lensnode for softening textures, you can also use colorlab's lenslab as an alternative. For adding constrast, I use midgray .336 locked resolve's native contrast. Most I shoot zr on r3d raw, so exposure and wb correction are done on raw tab, you can either use linear gain or hdr exposure/wb on non raw footages with lum mix set to zero. You can change the native contrast mode on resolve preference either set it to linear or s-curve whichever you prefer. Maybe a final contour layer to shape the final tone before drt. You can also DM me if you need something to study or rnd together.
