Gold Elopement Love Preset Collection

I don't get it: if you look at the video showing how to use the presets from their website you will see they have presets such as Alaska, Cape Town, Florance, Home 2. The presets shared don't have these names... Any thoughts why?

 

idk maybe they changed some of names. compare settings from video u can find them i guess.

 

My (PURCHASED)set shows these...what does yours look like?

 

The one shared here looks like this attachment :

 

There is a difference, few presets are not the same... Ikngood, do you mind share your version? Yours is the real one obviously, the one that also apear on their site, in the video.

 

That would be awesome @lkngood @Fiesta

 

[mod edit: non-working link removed]

 

Thanks alot lkngood!

 

These are the original V1 presets updated and converted for Photoshop CC and Lightroom CC (.xmp template). Enjoy!

Here is version 1 and version 2:

Hidden Content:

**Hidden Content: Content of this hidden block can only be seen by Gold Members(click for instructions) after they click 'Like'.**

[mod edit: posts merged]

 

@salleno v1 & v2 ? what do you refer? ty

 

Anyone else who has realized that those presets seem to be a plain rip-off?

Preset "Utah" for example has EXACTLY the same tone curve etc. as Greg Petersen's Preset 4 from the PACK 03 G-PRESETS collection. The follwers on instagram are clearly bought and the whole site is just a large preset generic. Kinda reminds me of "Authentic Love" presets which did the same thing.

 

PS: might sound a bit hypocrite considering we share them for free, but nonetheless the owner (you can find her name and business address here: https://elopement.love/pages/legal-notice) seems to be making money off of other peoples work.

 

Dead links..

 

New link:

Hidden Content:

**Hidden Content: You must click 'Like' before you can see the hidden data contained here.**

 

dead links, reup?

 

Can you please re-up?

 

Hi! Is there any chance you could re-up this? Thanks

 

Hi! Is there any chance you could re-up this?